The traditional use of ergodic
theory in the foundations of equilibrium statistical mechanics is that
it provides a link between thermodynamic observables and microcanonical
probabilities. First of all, the ergodic theorem demonstrates the
equality of microcanonical phase averages and infinite time averages
(albeit for a special class of systems, and up to a measure zero set of
exceptions). Secondly, one argues that actual measurements of
thermodynamic quantities yield time averaged quantities, since
measurements take a long time. The combination of these two points is
held to be an explanation why calculating microcanonical phase averages
is a successful algorithm for predicting the values of thermodynamic
observables. It is also well-known that this account is problematic.
This survey intends to show that ergodic theory nevertheless may have
important roles to play, and it explores three other uses of ergodic
theory. Particular attention is paid, firstly, to the relevance of
specific interpretations of probability, and secondly, to the way in which
the concern with systems in thermal equilibrium is translated into
probabilistic language. With respect to the latter point, it is argued
that equilibrium should not be represented as a stationary probability
distribution as is standardly done; instead, a weaker definition is
presented.
This article is available as a gzipped PostScript
file, or (with limited access) as a HTML file.