2011

• Jong M.C. de, Knapen T.H.J., Ee R. van: Opposite influence of perceptual memory on new and ongoing sensory ambiguity. PLoSONE, in press 2011.
• Klink C., Wezel R.J.A. van, Ee R. van: United we sense, divided we fail: Context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, in press 2011.
• Knapen T.H.J., Pearson J., Brascamp J.W., Ee R. van, Blake R.: Activity in frontal cortex during bistability reflects perceptual indecision. Journal of NeuroScience, 31(28): 10293-10301, 2011.
• Ee R. van: Percept-switch nucleation in binocular rivalry reveals local adaptation characteristics of early visual processing. Journal of Vision, 11(2):13, 1–12, 2011.
• Graaf T. de, Jong M.C. de, Goebel R., Ee R. van, Sack A.T.: On the Functional Relevance of Frontal Cortex for Passive and Voluntarily Controlled Bistable Vision. Cerebal Cortex, 21(10): 2322-2331, 2011.
• Ee R. van: Waarom voel je je onderbuik bij turbulentie? NRC next, 19 Mei 2011.
• Ee R. van: Waarom val je in de trein in slaap? NRC next, April 2011.

2010

• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Stereo-Vision: Head-Centric Coding of Retinal Signals. Current Biology, 20, No 13 R567, 2010.
• Kooi F.L., Dekker D., Ee R. van, Brouwer A.: Real 3D increases perceived depth over anaglyphs but does not cancel stereo-anomaly. Displays, 31, 132-138, 2010.
• Wismeijer D.A., Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van, M. Wexler: Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements. Journal of Vision, 10(6):25, 1-15, 2010.
• Alais D.A., Boxtel J.J.A. van, Parker A., Ee R. van: Attenting to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 50, 929-935, 2010.
• Brascamp J.W., Kanai R., Walsh V., Ee R. van: Human Middle Temporal Cortex, perceptual bias, and perceptual memory for ambiguous Three-Dimensional motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(2):760-766, 2010.
• Koenderink J.J., Albertazzi L., Doorn A.J. van, Ee R. van, Grind W.A. van de, Kappers A.M.L., Lappin J.S., Norman J.F., Oomes A.H.J., Pas S.F. te, Phillips F., Pont S.C., Richards W.A., Todd J.T., Verstraten F.A.J., Vries S. de: Does monocular visual space contain planes? Acta Psychologica, 134, 40-47, 2010.

2009

• Ee R. van: Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: Evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 26, 2612-2622, 2009.
• Ee R. van, Boxtel J.J.A. van, Parker A.L., Alais D.M.: Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11641-11649, 2009. (Supplementary material )
• Brouwer G.J., Tong F., Hagoort P., Ee R. van: Perceptual incongruence influences bistability and cortical activation. PLoS ONE, 4(3): e5056, 2009.
• Raemaekers M., Schaaf M.E. van der, Ee R. van, Wezel R.J.A. van: Widespread fMRI activity differences between perceptual states in rivalry are correlated with differences in observer biases. Brain Research 1252, 161-171, 2009.

2008

• Boxtel J.J.A. van, Alais D.M., Ee R. van: Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision 8(5):17, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/8/5/17/, 2008.
• Boxtel J.J.A. van, Alais D., Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE 3(1): e1429, 2008.
• Boxtel J.J.A. van, Knapen T., Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Journal of Vision, 8(15):13, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/8/15/13/, 2008.
• Brascamp J.W., Knapen T.H.J., Kanai R., Noest A.J., Ee R. van, Berg A.V. van den: Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 3(1): e1497, 2008.
• Kamphuisen A.P., Bauer M., Ee R. van: No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex. Journal of Vision 8(5):4, 1-8, 2008.
• Klink P.C., Ee R. van, Nijs M.M., Brouwer G.J., Noest A.J., Wezel R.J.A. van: Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. Journal of Vision 8(5):16, 1-18, http://www.journalofvision.org/8/5/16/, 2008.
• Klink C., Ee R. van, Wezel R.J.A. van: General Validity of Levelt's Propositions Reveals Common Computational Mechanisms for Visual Rivalry. PLoS ONE, 3(10), e3473, 2008.
• Wismeijer D.A., Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence. Experimental Brain Research 184, 61-70, 2008.

2007

• Boxtel J.J.A. van, Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. Journal of Vision, 7(14):3, 1-11, 2007.
• Brascamp J.W., Knapen T.H.J., Kanai R., Ee R van., Berg A.V. van den: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 7(12):12, 1-12, 2007.
• Brouwer G.J., Ee R. van: Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. The Journal of NeuroScience 27, 1015-1023, 2007.
• Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: Monocular symmetry in binocular vision. Journal of Vision, 7(4):5, 1-9, 2007.
• Kamphuisen A.P., Wezel R.J.A. van, Ee R. van: Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry. Vision Research 47, 1142-1144, 2007.
• Kanai R., Knapen T.H.J., Ee R. van, Verstraten F.A.J.: Disruption of implicit perceptual memory by intervening neutral stimuli. Vision Research, 47, 2675-2683, 2007.
• Knapen T.H.J., Kanai R., Brascamp J.W., Boxtel J.J.A. van, Ee R. van: Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry. Vision Research 47, 3269-3275, 2007.
• Knapen T.H.J., Ee R. van, Blake R.: Stimulus motion propels traveling waves in binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE, 2(8): e739, 2007.
• Knapen T.H.J., Paffen C., Kanai R., Ee R. van: Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 47, 1-7, 2007.
• Noest A.J., Ee R., Nijs M.M., Wezel R.J.A. van: Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli:A low-level neural model. Journal of Vision 7(8):10, 1-14, 2007.

2006

• Boxtel J.J.A. van, Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: A single system explains human speed perception. Journal of Cognitive NeuroScience 18, 1808-1819, 2006.
• Brascamp J.W., Ee R. van, Noest A.J., Jacobs R.H.A.H., Berg A.V. van den: The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Journal of Vision 6, 1244-1256, 2006.
• Brouwer G.J., Ee R. van: Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics. Vision Research 46, 3393-3402, 2006.
• Dam L.C.J. van, Ee R. van: Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 6, 1172-1179, 2006.
• Dam L.C.J. van, Ee R. van: The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46, 787-799, 2006.
• Ee R. van, Noest A.J., Brascamp J.W., Berg A.V. van den: Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means don’t make the difference. Vision Research 46, 3129-3141, 2006.
• Knapen T.H.J., Ee R. van: Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently. Vision Research 46, 3381-3492, 2006.
• Noest A.J., Ee R. van, Berg A.V. van den: Direct extraction of curvature-based metric shape from stereo by view-modulated receptive fields. Biological Cybernetics 95, 455-486, 2006.

2005

• Berg A.V. van den, Ee R. van, Noest A.J.: Mixed visual reference frames: perceiving nonretino-centric visual quantities in a retino-centric frame. Proc. SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 2005.
• Brascamp J.W., Ee R. van, Pestman W.R., Berg A.V. van den: Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5, 287-298, 2005.
• Brouwer G.J., Ee R. van, Schwarzbach J.: Activation in visual cortex correlates with the awareness of stereoscopic depth. Journal of NeuroScience 25, 10403-10413, 2005.
• Ee R. van: Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research 45, 29-40, 2005; doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.039.
• Ee R. van, Dam L.C.J. van, Brouwer G.J.: Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research 45, 41-55, 2005; doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.030.
• Ee R. van, Krumina G., Pont S.C., Ven S. van der: Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 141-148, 2005.
• Dam L.C.J. van, Ee R. van: The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vision Research 45, 2417-2435, 2005.
• Ouden H.E.M. den, Ee R. van, Haan E. de: Colour helps to solve the binocular matching problem. Journal of Physiology 567.2, 665-671, 2005.

2004

• Dam L.C.J. van, Ee R. van: Stereoscopic matching and the aperture problem. Perception 33, 769-787, 2004.

2003

• Both M.H., Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Perceived slant from Werner's illusion affects binocular eye movements. Journal of Vision 3, 685-697, 2003.
• Ee R. van, Adams W.J., Mamassian P.: Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bi-stability in stereoscopic slant perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 20, 1398-1406, 2003.
• Ee R. van: Correlation between stereoanomaly and perceived depth when disparity and motion interact in binocular matching. Perception 32, 67-84, 2003.
• Ee R. van, Dam L.C.J. van: The influence of cyclovergence on unconstrained stereoscopic matching. Vision Research 43, 307-319, 2003.
• Hol K., Koene A., Ee R. van: Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Vision 3, 486-498, 2003.

2002

• Berends E.M., Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Vertical disparity can alter perceived direction. Perception 31, 1323-1333, 2002.
• Ee R. van, Dam L.C.J. van, Erkelens C.J.: Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. Journal of Vision 2, 597-607, 2002.
• Ee R. van, Richards W.: A planar and a volumetric test for stereoanomaly. Perception 31, 51-64, 2002.
• Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: Multi-coloured stereograms unveil two binocular colour mechanisms in human vision. Vision Research 42, 1103-1112, 2002.
• Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: The role of the cyclopean eye in vision: sometimes inappropriate, always irrelevant. Vision Research 42, 1157-1163, 2002.

2001

• Adams W.J., Banks M.S., Ee R. van: Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 4, 1063-1064, 2001.
• Ee R. van, Anderson B.L.: Motion direction, speed, and orientation in binocular matching. Nature 410, 690-694, 2001.
• Ee R. van: Perceptual learning without feedback and the stability of stereoscopic slant estimation. Perception 30, 95-114, 2001.
• Ee R. van, Anderson B.L., Farid H.: Occlusion junctions do not improve stereoacuity. Spatial Vision 15, (1 Nov 2001), 45-59, 2001.

2000

• Ee R. van, Schor C.M.: Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines. Vision Research 40, 151-162, 2000.
• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision? Perception & Psychophysics 62, 910-926, 2000.

1999

• Backus B.T., Banks M.S., Ee R. van, Crowell J.A.: Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research 39, 1143-1170, 1999.
• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: The influence of large scanning eye movements on stereoscopic slant estimation of large surfaces. Vision Research 39, 467-479, 1999.
• Ee R. van, Banks M.S., Backus B.T.: Perceived visual direction near an occluder. Vision Research 39, 4085-4097, 1999.
• Ee R. van, Banks M.S., Backus B.T.: An analysis of stereoscopic slant contrast. Perception 28, 1121-1145, 1999.

1998

• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: An evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory. Vision Research 38, 3871-3882, 1998.
• Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: A computational model of depth perception based on headcentric disparity. Vision Research 38, 2999-3018, 1998.

1997

• Banks M.S., Ee R. van, Backus B.T.: The computation of binocular visual direction: A re-examination of Mansfield and Legge (1997). Vision Research 37, 1605-1610, 1997.
• Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: Capture of visual direction: An unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision. Vision Research 37, 1193-1196, 1997.
• Erkelens C.J., Ee R. van: Capture of the visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects. Vision Research 37, 1735-1745, 1997.

1996

• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research 36, 43-51, 1996.
• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Anisotropy in Werner's binocular depth-contrast effect. Vision Research 36, 2253-2262, 1996.
• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Stability of binocular depth perception with moving head and eyes. Vision Research 36, 3827-3842, 1996.
• Erkelens C.J., Muijs A.J.M., Ee R. van: Binocular alignment in different depth planes. Vision Research 36, 2141-2147, 1996.

1995

• Ee R. van, Erkelens C.J.: Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. Perception 24, 299-314, 1995.